Chair's Report on the State and Local Politics Section of the New York
State Political Science Association’s 71st Annual Conference
Why State and Local Politics Matter
I love teaching State and Local Politics. As citizens, our
lives are directly impacted by the choices made by our state and local elected
officials. Polling demonstrates that
citizens feel closer to and have more trust in local governing bodies than they
do in our national institutions.
Yet, there is an unfortunate lack of civic knowledge and
literacy particularly regarding politics at the state level. For many people, their daily news intake is
focused on national politics (and it is not as if there is nothing to see
nowadays) or on the very local -- what’s happening in their own back yard or
community. For those living outside of
the capital region, the regular workings of State government are not as
regularly covered by the media they consume – and what is covered may be
disproportionately focused on the dysfunctional or corrupt.
I’ll admit it: when I teach state and local government, I
often focus on the dysfunction as a hook for generating student
interest. In this respect, New York is
the gift that just keeps on giving. Following
a lecture just after the 2009 state senate coup, I remember a non-major
approaching me after class to pronounce the whole affair as “wicked
interesting” and to express shock that so many New Yorkers (himself included) could
be blissfully unaware of the high drama and low comedy playing out in our statehouse. Another semester, the class kept busy
resetting the “legislative arrest clock” (seeing how many consecutive days we
could go without a legislative indictment or arrest). It was fun—until it wasn’t; until the students,
as citizens, realized that we all deserved better. And that’s what makes “gawking at the train
wreck” okay – if those of us who teach state and local politics can hook our
audience with the “fun” in the sometimes spectacular dysfunction, we can then turn
the corner into discussing the value of being civically literate regarding the
role, function, and purpose of local government. From that somewhat unhappy starting place, we
can move on to more productive avenues of discussion, including the various
paths for meaningful reform.
Since 2009 (with a hiatus in 2015), I have had the privileged
to serve as the chairperson of the State and Local Politics section of the New York State Political Science Association
(NYSPSA). I have never been more
convinced of the vibrancy and importance of state and local governance, or of
contributions made by the academic study of state and local affairs. My role with this professional organization
allows me to work with and learn from the best.
The State Constitutional Convention Question
At the 71st NYSPSA Conference (hosted by Nazareth
College in Rochester, NY), New York State and Local Politics took center stage.
Among the highlights of the Conference were presentations and a Keynote
Roundtable discussion of the upcoming Constitutional Convention (or Con-Con)
vote. As detailed in a previous blogpost, in the upcoming general election (November 7, 2017), New York voters will
have the chance to vote on the constitutionally mandated question of whether or
not to convene a constitutional convention with the purpose of reviewing and
proposing revisions to the New York State Constitution. My section of the conference bought together
some of the leading experts on New York State politics and reform.
A group of scholars from the Hugh I. Carey Institute for
Governmental Reform (Wagner College) and the Center for the Advancement
of Public Integrity (CAPI) (Columbia Law School), presented their research
on “Achieving Reform Through State Constitutional Change,” situating New York
within a nationwide study of state constitutional reform efforts.
Dr. Stephen Greenwald (left) leads a discussion following the presentation on Achieving Reform through State Constitutional Change. |
Dr. Robert Herbst provided an overview of the pros and cons of constitutional conventions, highlighting many of the positive, popular elements of New York’s Constitution which were the direct result of conventions past. A contextual frame was provided by law professor and CAPI Director, Jennifer Rodgers, who detailed the group’s ongoing research: a comparative analysis of state constitutional provisions. Their completed study (due out this summer) will serve as the basis for specific policy recommendations, would educate voters, and inform the convention delegates as they consider revision. Dr. Stephen Greenwald emphasized how constitutional revision might enhance representative democracy by addressing existing dysfunctions, including the devolution of decision making autonomy of state legislators.
New York’s Broken
Constitution (2016),
co-authored by our presenters details
issues with New York's current
constitutional design.
|
Christopher Bopst, one of the co-authors (along with Drs.
Peter Galie and Gerald Benjamin) of New
York’s Broken Constitution (2016), set up the context for the impending
ballot question, by providing an overview of the constitution and the history past
constitutional conventions. He emphasized the unique power held by New Yorkers
(“We the People) to bypass the legislature and demand reform via the
conventional ballot vote. The convention and delegate selection processes,
including the external factors which influence public and organizational support
and opposition, were addressed by Dr. Dullea (a participant in past conventions
and an expert on convention politics). Dr. Galie explained the arguments for and
against reform, highlighting the ways in which a constitutional convention is
uniquely different from politics “as usual.”
What
did We Learn?
There’s a need for reform:
Ø
New York’s Constitution dates back to 1894. The
last time a convention comprehensively studied was 50 years ago (1967); the
last time there was a systematic revision was 79 years ago (1938)
Ø
The speakers identified numerous issues for
review and revision, including:
o
Public ethics and anti-corruption reform
o
Campaign Finance reform
o
Legislative reforms – to create a more
participatory legislative process
o
Voting reforms – to promote turnout and ease
restrictions on the right to vote
o
Criminal Justice Reforms
o
Education Policy Reforms
o
Judicial Reforms
o
Local government reform
Ø
The mandatory referendum is a rare opportunity
for voters to bypass the legislature and demand review and revision on a
multiplicity of issues that matter most to the voters.
There is Fear of a Convention:
Ø An Unlimited Convention/no restrictions on the
convention. Once convened, the argument goes, the delegates are without limit
and might eliminate the good along with the bad. Enviornmental groups, labor unions, and
advocates for the needy are among the opposition groups who fear favorable
provisions might be revised or excised.
Ø The “same old politics” and political insiders will
dominate the convention.
Ø The convention will be costly. And (as happened in 1967), proposed changes might
get rejected in the end anyway.
There is a General Lack of Public
Awareness:
Ø
For many New Yorkers, the state constitutional
convention may not appear to be a viable path to reform simply because they do
not know enough about the process.
Ø
Thus far, the State legislature has devoted few
resources to educating the citizens about the upcoming ballot choice. Most of the outside money that is being
spent, is in opposition.
Ø
In past ballot votes, the plurality of voters
declined to vote on the ballot question.
The presenters collectively provided a wealth of factual information and counter-arguments which would
allow voters to make an informed choice come November. Many of the anti-convention fears, they explained, are
unfounded and reflect a misunderstanding of the rich history of the convention
process:
Ø There is, they remind us, much in the New York
Constitution that is good – and most of which was added through the work of
constitutional conventions.
Ø Even in cases of “failed” conventions, as in 1967 when
the voters rejected the proposed revisions, many of the conventions recommendations later made their way into the constitution through the legislative amendment process.
Ø What conventions offer is a unique opportunity for
systematic study and recommendation – it is different than politics “as usual”
because the particpants are broader, the mission is directed, and the work
ultimately is subject to popular ratification.
Ø The work of the convention will depend on the delegates selected – and this is process that is open to direct democratic
participation.
Ø The costs of the convention will be offset by the potential benefits – for example, a consolidation of the judiciary and court systems alone
could produce considerable savings.
A member of the audience, Dr. Michael
Armato made the insightful observation that the outcome of the convention
ballot question is likely to turn on the narrative and framing of the
debate. Dr. Galie described the eternal
paradox for all reformers: if people believe that the “same old” of politics is
bad, and reform is framed as the “same old” politics, then there is seemingly
no solution: We are left to dwell on the dysfunction without ever turning the
corner toward productive engagement and change.
How to Learn More
How to Learn More
The constitutional convention question is a unique
opportunity for voters to compel study and review of the foundation of New York State's governance. The best way to make an
informed decision on the ballot vote is to learn everything one can about the
process. Sienna College's statewide polling has found that, although 69%
of New York voters support calling a convention, more than two-thirds
of them have not seen or read information on the upcoming vote.
The League of Women Voters, the Rockefeller Institute of Government, the Hugh I. Carey Institute for Governmental Reform, and the New York State Constitutional Convention Clearinghouse are a few good places to start if you want to learn more. On these sites you will find details on the history and work of New York's past constitutional conventions, as well as information, and links to editorials and news coverage of the upcoming “Con-Con” vote.
You may also contact me directly at lparshal@daemen.edu.
Dr. Lisa Parshall
Chairperson, State and Local Politics, New
York State Political Science Association
Daemen College
Students:
State
and Local Politics (PSC 114) will be offered in Fall 2017 (Thursday 4-6:45). Dr. Parshall is the Section Chair for State
and Local Politics for the New York State Political Science Association (NYPSA)
and a Key Votes Advisor (New York State) for Project Vote Smart. Her research interests include New York State
constitutional history and local government consolidation/reform. She has presented her research on village
government consolidation at multiple conferences. For more information on the course, please
contact lparshal@daemen.edu.
No comments:
Post a Comment