Dr. Farida Jalalzai, the featured speaker
for Women’s History Month, presented her research on women, gender, and
politics in a March 28th event in the History & Politics Event Series. In her guest blog post below, Brianna
Zichettella (junior, PSC), discusses Dr. Jalalzai’s presentation, “The Global Dimensions of Women’s Executive
Leadership,” which examined the relationship between gender and political
leadership in the international setting.
Dr. Farida Jalalzai |
By Brianna Zichettella (guest
blogger)
In the wake of an American
presidential election where a woman won the popular vote for the first time in
American history, Farida Jalalzai’s research is especially relevant to both domestic
and global politics. Her work focuses on the women who occupy and run for
executive leadership positions such as prime minister or president. Despite
significant increases in female leadership over the last sixty years, gender representation
in executive positions is far from equal. According to Jalalzai’s statistics,
there have been 144 female executive leaders between 1960, when the first
female prime minister was elected, and 2017. Women are more likely to be prime
ministers than presidents, but there are still 61% of countries have never had
a female leader. Additionally, in 2017, only 6% of executive leaders are women.
There are many different factors
that can influence a woman’s chances of becoming an executive leader. Jalalzai
cites increased elite control, multi-party political systems, and
liberal-leaning government as a few of the factors that tend to result in more
female leadership. Regardless of the existence of these structures, many claim
that more women do not hold executive leadership positions because women do not
run.
Jalalzai disagrees. Her argument is
that women run for executive office, but because many voters associate masculine
traits with those positions, women are not often elected. For example, it is
possible that more women tend to be prime ministers because the position
emphasizes cooperation over the top-down hierarchical power structure of a
presidency, and the role of a prime minister corresponds more closely with
societal expectations for women’s’ behavior.
In addition to this, Jalalzai
demonstrated that people tend to support the idea of a qualified female
candidate from their party, but if pressed, those same people are more critical
of women’s capabilities. Therefore, another reason for why more women are prime
ministers could stem from the biases that people bring into the voting booth. Jalalzai’s research indicates that women
are more successful in systems that do not choose executives through direct
public input, such as prime minister positions that are chosen by a party
rather than the voters.
Jalalzai argues that women candidates
are often more qualified than their male counterparts. Despite this, they are
held to higher standards and face more criticism about their appearance,
speaking styles, and whether or not they smile. All three types of judgment can
be seen in a lot of the criticism of Hillary Clinton in the 2016 presidential
race.
No comments:
Post a Comment